More than $43,700, second place was $11,000 less, a month for copier services canceled and a bidding do-over. Not sure if the good guys won on this or not.
Either way, more mud in an already murky industry, slung for all to see.
I would love to have been a fly on the wall during the Xerox weekly sales meeting!
This story first hit a month ago - one of the losing suitors cried "foul" and gummed up the works for the winning vendor, and ultimately wrecking the school districts plan to upgrade copiers.
I felt at the time that there must have been more to the story than was written - hell, we have all been there before.
The risk of challenging a board's decision is daunting, and such a delta must mean a huge difference in offerings.
And indeed there is a difference - the most stark, Xerox proposed 1.5 "bodies" in their recommendation.
District officials said last month they "...went with Xerox because the company offered to provide one full-time employee and one part-time employee based locally to oversee maintenance of the copying machines..."
Some really quick math, reveals and approximate purchase price or funded amount, of $19k/machine. Wow.
The offended competitor, Fisher's Document Systems Inc., said its proposal offered to provide service within four hours.
"We do have concerns. Our patrons have concerns. We have stepped back," School board chairman Mike Vuittonet said Tuesday. Funny how they "have concerns" now, after the deal had been awarded and after the second place vendor objected - spineless public, bureaucrats.
Two words - Home School.
So everyone here is looking out for the benefit of some 34,000 students whose teachers will be using old equipment come this fall, right?
Xerox was just trying to propose the best solution - 1.5 bodies for 120, distributed copiers? HUH?
Fisher's Document Systems Inc, is just trying to save the tax payers money. And recommending copier's for 60 months is a GOOD thing? Were they recommending Sharp? Over X? Even with 4 hour response time and promised 24 hour machine replacement? Bravo Sierra.
Ultimately, the responsibility, the blame, rests squarely in the lap of the District for short-sighting the RFP process. For looking at printing the same way the board before them did and the one before.
I wonder how many copiers sit right next to fax machines and feet away from single function laser printers. I wonder how many thousands of dollars worth of toner and ink supplies are stuffed into Principal offices, teachers lounges and class room closets.
Was the RFP a 1:1 replacement?
And finally, how many teachers will be standing in line at the local Kinko's, the night before a quiz, coughing up personal fundage and paying for "clicks"?
The stench of "fail" hangs on everyone in this deal - pity the teachers and the students...